Screenhead.com -- the alternative movie blog.

Harry Potter And The Half-Blood Prince Movie Review–A Foregone Conclusion

It may not surprise many of you to realize, as I sit here at the depths of three in the morning writing this up, having braved the terrors of a quite thoroughly packed 12:01 showing of Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, that I had something of a crisis of conscience writing this one up.

After all, I said to my screen, balefully, and sucking back a cup of hot green and white fusion tea against whatever diseases the numerous little hellions that were in that theatre were carrying, was there anyone out there who was going to actually NEED this movie reviewed for them?  Surely pretty much everybody has already made their decision–most of the people planning to see Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince had likely bought their tickets weeks prior, and those without plan to see it refuse to do so on religious grounds, convinced quite thoroughly that Harry Potter is enslaving the youth of America and pushing them down a dark path of satanic witchcraft, wicca, and voting Democrat.

Anyway, the plot: Harry’s back for yet another year at Hogwart’s, learning all about potions and wands and assorted mystical hoodoo whatnot.  Meanwhile, the vague creeping evil that is Lord Voldemort still pretty much refuses to show itself except through his minions.  This time, not only does Harry and company have to defend the school and its inhabitants from the advances of the dark lord, but they’ll also deal with all those typical teenage things like crushes, fending off aggressive suitors, and countering the occasional misdirected love potion.  Describing the plot in much more than these vague terms would require massive spoilers, because this plot is very much dependent on its specifics.

I’m rather convinced Harry’s going for his master’s or something because he’s been there several years.  Even the characters are getting a little bored of it–there’s one really great sequence where one of the teachers (I think it’s McGonagall but no one mentioned names much) gave an exasperated sigh and asked, why, whenever something horrible happens, you three (meaning Harry, Ron and Hermione) are always involved.  Imagine my shock when I muttered virtually the same line that Ron gave back, saying that they’ve wondered the exact same thing.

Well, Ron, buddy–so does the audience.

I personally have several problems with this movie, especially as it relates backward through the canon (for instance, why does Harry never use that expecto petronum or whatever any more?  Does it only work on Dementors? You’d figure if you’ve got this really uber spell you’d actually bust it out on occasion, especially when you’re in a fight as Harry seems to be every twenty minutes or so.).  But chances are my problems simply stem from the fact that I’m going in cold on this, having never read the books.

However, the critical fact remains–this is not really a bad movie, but rather, this is a movie that preaches only to the choir.  If you’re not already enamored with Harry Potter and his world, chances are you never will be.  There are few fence-sitters here, and so, you’re either desperate to see it or desperate to avoid coming in contact with it.

So what does it get on the ten-scale?  Easy.  A seven out of ten.  It’s beautiful, the environments are great, the actors are at least tolerable even if the plot, much like the lost continent of Atlantis, no longer appears on any map.  For that handful of you undecided, it’s worth a shot.

28 COMMENTS & TRACKBACKS

  1. Felipe
    July 15th, 2009 at 1:02 pm

    Sorry, but I think this is not a Harry Potter movie. It’s a romance film with a little of action. The only scene of realy action was invented and it’s very poor.
    Visual effects, better acting and good soundtrack? Yes, but screenwriter and director must be changed! For the public that didn’t read the book maybe it’s a fine movie, but for the fans it isn’t.

  2. Steve Anderson
    July 15th, 2009 at 1:45 pm

    Felipe–do bear in mind that I did say that I never read a Harry Potter book, so you’re actually agreeing with my assessment that it’s good if you haven’t read the books. Also, you should probably further consider that this one’s only meant to set up Deathly Hallows, so it probably will be a little slack in the action department.

  3. Ariel
    July 15th, 2009 at 11:23 pm

    As a huge fan of the books I cannot honestly say that I liked this one very much. Actually i left feeling pretty angery that I was up at three in the morning trying to get out of a jam packed movie theater. I thought the movie was dry and choppy. The actors all seemed staged and they also seemed out of integrity with the characters. Harry wouldn’t go wandering around on trains when people were trying to kill him. The book was soooooo good I was really expecting the movie to be soo much better.

  4. 2 hours of time wasted
    July 16th, 2009 at 4:16 am

    this is the worst movie i have ever seen in my life nothing happens for the first 2 hours then dumbledore dies then the movei finishs WTF

  5. Rex
    July 16th, 2009 at 9:35 am

    My first reaction was to yell at you for this review, considering you had not read the book. On the other hand, it is an outside perspective from someone who has not read the book.
    In an attempt to enjoy the movie and keep my expectations low I didn’t re-read the book this time , but if it can’t grab the attention of movie fans like you, then the movie makers definately slipped up this time.

  6. Steve Anderson
    July 16th, 2009 at 4:17 pm

    Rex–thanks for the restraint, brother. :D Besides, if I read everything there was out there I wouldn’t have time for movies. Then you wouldn’t get to read this sort of thing and I know how badly that would dismay the planet. Now, more than ever, you need your Steve fix.

    Oh, don’t look at me like that. I’m not that big an egomaniac in real life.

    2 hours–oh, come on; it wasn’t THAT bad. Sure, compared to the rest it was pretty weak sauce, but it wasn’t unwatchable. You want unwatchable, you should take a run at anything by Ulli Lommel sometime.

    Ariel–I’ve got to admit I caught that same feeling too. It’s like they’d all rather be out spending the fat cash they got off the previous movies rather than show up in this. This one felt really phoned in. The next one, though, might be the real winner. Or the worst disappointment ever. Who knows?

  7. Meg
    July 17th, 2009 at 2:39 am

    After waiting excitedly for Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince to finally come out, I was very disappointed in the movie.. It was nothing like the book and aren’t they supposed to be based on the book?? What happened to Bill and Fleur? Dobby and Kreacher? And there was nothing on Voldemort’s history! What happened to the Gaunts? The Quidditch Cup? Harry and Ginny had the worst first kiss ever! And how did Tonks and Lupin magically get together? In the Hogwarts Express, Tonks is meant to find Harry, not Luna. Where was Dumbledore’s funeral?? I know you have said you haven’t read the books but seeing as though you are the screen writer it’s your job to! This movie is the worst.. You hardly kept anything the same.. There is a lot more stuff which I am very disappointed in and annoyed about though I am not going to mention it. The suspense in the cave was great.. And the movie also had some funny parts so I do congratulate you on that..

  8. Rafael
    July 17th, 2009 at 11:01 am

    The Book was great, but the movie was stupid and boring.

    What happened?? I was shock after watching such a terrible movie, they didn’t care about the people that readed the book.

    I wasted my time.

    In the book tonks is ver sad abou Sirius Black death and because she is inlove with Lupin and Lupin is uncover with all the werewolves, in they just go for a visit to Molly Weasley like nothing is going on. In the book Neville, Hermione, Ron, Macgonnagal, Hagrid, Luna, everyone fight to protect Hogwarts, in the movie the y were just sleeping.

    Too many bad changes.

    Don’t waste your time watching the movie.

  9. Woodyplace
    July 17th, 2009 at 2:32 pm

    I was so disappointed. The screen play for this book stank to high heaven. There was no magic, no excitment and definitely no plot. If I were JK Rowling, I’d be cussing my head off in anger.

  10. Sean
    July 17th, 2009 at 4:03 pm

    Come on guys, it wasn’t that bad of a movie. As a massive fan of the books, the movies are NEVER going to live up to my expectations even if they leave tiny things out so I’ve just come to accept these movies as they are. I actually thought this was the best ‘Potter’ movie, sure it left lots of stuff out but so did the previous three. When you look at it this way, HBP has a nice mix of comedy, action, drama, horror and fantasy. And it’s much more entertaining then the previous five. Believe me you’ll all be agreeing with when you watch this movie more, it will grow on you guys!

    However, I was not that happy with the lack of plot and character detail. Ginny all of a sudden has become very prominent in the plot but in the previous few movies, she has had barely any lines of screen time at all. So Harry and Ginny’s sudden romance would have confused movie-only fans. Same goes for Lupin and Tonks’ romance!!!

    I understand that many people find 2 and a half hours a long time for some people to sit through so I understand why the filmakers make it so short! But to impress fans they should release an extended edition of about 4 hours to impress those die hard HP fans!

  11. Ami
    July 18th, 2009 at 11:32 am

    Pooh Pooh Pooh – Harry You Did Not Stay True!

    The magic of the book is ruined by the director and screen writer’s interpretation! Producers’ of Book’s tured Movies should always try to remain true to the authors’s vision. The audience appreciate a new vision but DOES not appreciate re-writes!

    This movie was terrible on so many levels that one has too wonder why they even bothered? This movie certainly did not cater to the fan base.

  12. doz
    July 19th, 2009 at 8:30 am

    the worst movie i watched so far! they just wasted the good plot of HBP. i want a REMAKE!! DAMN!

  13. Cortney.
    July 20th, 2009 at 5:14 pm

    I have waited an extremely long time for this film to come out. HBP was my favorite book out of all. I know that books are never really like t movie, but this was just horrible. It was not even a little like the book. I could name so many things they should have showed and didnt, but i wont bother. Any real fan will know what i mean. Btw, whoever wrote this ‘review’ needs to just stop. You cant write a review for a movie based on a book if you have not watched the movie. Personally, if you have not read the book, that movie wont make a lick of sense to you. Yes, its STUPID. I left the theatre pissed off. Oh, and the actors acted funny in this movie too, they just seemed different.

  14. Cortney.
    July 20th, 2009 at 5:18 pm

    I meant to say You cant write a review for a movie based on a book if you have not read the book. Hence, your not a real critic, just someone pretending to be one. Am i the only one who caught that?

  15. Rosister1
    July 22nd, 2009 at 8:14 pm

    I was very dissappointed. Anyone giving this movie a 7 or higher has not watched any of the other HP mvies. This one was as bad as the Goblet of Fire.
    It jumps around, makes up events that did not occur so that they can make up for the fact that they are jumping atound from one scene to the next. I would not want to sit through 2 1/2 hours of “lovy-dovy” kissing stuff, but you can not show Harry and Ginny kissing without some better setup and anticipation as was described in the book.
    As for the visual effects, the begiining effects at the house and the ending effects of the cave are at the highest quality as we have seen in the other HP movies. Everything else, was dull and muddled.
    On a separate issue, I agree with Cortney that a reviewer should read the books to give an honest review of the movie. A 7 out of ten for a 2 1/2 hour movie with no real action. Please. More like 4 out of 10.

  16. Steve Anderson
    July 22nd, 2009 at 9:18 pm

    Meg–plain and simple, they can’t include everything. That’s what happened with the Lord of the Rings series too.

    Sean–generally, I agree with you. In fact, specifically I agree with you too.

    Ami–you watched it, didn’t you? It caters to the fan base. I’m pretty sure no one else showed up.

    Cortney–the operative term is MOVIE critic. I don’t review books, at least not here. I wrote up the movie I saw, not how it connects back to the book, not how it relates to the rest of the canon. I could have, but I didn’t. Instead, I focused on the movie. I’m sorry if you’re dissatisfied, but that’s the angle I went with. Hopefully you’re reading the other movie reviews instead.

    Rosister–Granted, you’re right in saying that this is one of the worst in the series, but on a purely objective scale, that’s still pretty good. I think you’re somewhat misunderstanding the ten-scale here: a seven is only somewhat better than average across ALL MOVIES. Surely you can admit that this movie’s got better effects than, say, The Hangover. And again, I’m dealing strictly with the movie, not its relationship to the book.

  17. sherrie
    July 24th, 2009 at 9:01 pm

    As a diehard fan I just wanted to list all the things they left out, then i will make a comment:
    1. the beginning scene were Harry inherits the Black house and Kreature
    2. the part where Dumbledore tells Harry he will be taking lessons that could help him defeat Voldermort.
    3. The fact that Tonks and Remus were not a couple in the begining
    4.A lot of Draco’s story was left out
    5.They were supposed to take apperation lessons
    6.A could have been scene when Ron hit Harry for snogging Ginny
    7.Bill and Fleur’s story
    8.The big battle in the castle
    9. Bill getting attacked by Fenfir
    10. The scene where Scrimgeour shows himself to the muggle Prime Minister
    11.They left out Crabbe and Goyle being turned into girls to lookout for Draco in the room of requirement
    12.All of Riddles background, with that good luck at finding the horocruxes because they never even went into how Dumbledore sowed him what some of them could be
    13.The end where they found out how Snape was the half-blood prince
    14. ginny and Harry actully becoming a couple
    15.the biggest thing Dumbledore’s Funeral
    16.Dumbledore’s memory where Riddle asks for a job at hogwarts to teach defense against the dark arts.
    17.they left out the when harry finds out that Snape is the one who overheard Trelawney’s prophecy about Voldermort during her interview for the position as divination teacher with Dumbledore
    18.the fact that Harry used his invisibility cloak a couple of times b/c Dumbledore told him to keep it on him at all times
    19.How Harry told Ron and Hermoine that he was going with Dumbledore to get the next horucrux and gave them the rest of the Felix and maurder’s map
    20. For those who dont understand what half-blood prince has to do with the move, b/c they didnt explain it at all in the movie. Snape is half muggle and half witch. His mother was a witch whose last name was…Prince. so he was proud to be half Prince. also it has to do with Voldermort, Harry and Snape because they are all half blooded. Voldemort mother was witch and father a muggle. Harry mother was muggle born and father was a wizard, and Snape,as i already explained, mother is a witch and father a muggle.
    WTF!!!!! I could go on but as i wright this i get more upset at how they took a great book and flushed it down the toilet. Also they found time to put made up scenes that never happened in the move but couldn’t find the time to put actual plots from the book in there. what sense did that make. I am utterly disappointed by this move and will not go see the last 2 films.

  18. Meghan
    July 25th, 2009 at 4:35 am

    alright, where to start? first..i am a huge fan of the books..and from experience learned that when it comes to watching a movie of a book that you have read you can’t expect much…that said, I enter into the theater at 12:01 with very low expectations and for most of the movie i wasn’t that disappointed..the camera shots were good, the layout of how everyone seemed to cross path without knowing was actually kind of cool..the acting (as always was regrettable..but when you pick a kid at the age of eleven..it’s kind of like shooting in the dark) what i find completely unforgivable…(so much that i left the movie very mad) is that they left out the ending battle.

    while i understand that the movie could not place everything in the book i find it is almost insulting to JK Rollings that they added stuff that wasn’t in the book(the burning burrow) and left out important stuff…like actually showing all the memories that Harry goes to.. (do the producers not read the books..every single memory is VERY important in the 7th book)
    plus more of Draco story and the fact that Harry now owns Keatcher(sorry about spelling) is important too…
    and on other note..having the movie as a sappy romance thing where every single relationship is awkward..really doesn’t fit…they are heading into war..even the last two movies understood that the latter books (therefore the movies) are dark. there for the set up of voldemolt’s past..the war now becoming personal (hence the fight that they left out) should have been their main goal..not lets make Harry and Ginny act all awkward together because there in high school..

    however i can see how if one has not read the books, nor knows anything about what the books hold, the movie could be good even despite the bad acting…
    and with if possible even lower standards you will find me at opening night for the next two movies (can’t get much worse, can it?)

  19. Louise
    July 26th, 2009 at 3:27 am

    The problem with the movie is not that we just want EVERYTHING included from the book. The problem is that the book is all about set up for the last book and this movie failed to set up the big finale. Important information that helps Harry to figure out where the horcruxes are has been omitted.The romance is not particularly important when you are trying to save the wizarding world. Characters that play a vital role in the next book were omitted from this movie. Essentially the director has shot himself in the foot by taking these important elements out. If all you are looking for is a good movie, sure, it’s passable. But if you are looking for a good depiction of the Harry Potter saga, it stinks. People who read the books are angry because the director is ignoring key set up elements that make the final book the amazing, better than all the rest story that this saga deserves. We’ve waited a long time for it and we can see that he’s already screwed up.

  20. Ellen
    July 26th, 2009 at 11:29 am

    Like some i was VERY disappointed in Half Blood Prince! I have to ask myself what was Ms. Rowling thinking when she approved teh screenplay for this movie? Not putting in plots from the book that are essential to the last movie, writing in scenes that NEVER happened. If you don’t read the books you have no idea why in the world Snape called himself the half blood prince, you have no idea where the cave scene comes into play. And how in the @#$% does David Yates plan to start the next movie seeing as he and the screenwriters blew up Rons house? where is the scene where the new minster of magic shows himself to the prime minsiter of England, Where is the scene when Dumbledore tells Harry that he will be giving him private lessons, and to take his clodk EVERYWHERE with him, where is Fleur and Bill’s story, where is the big fight scene at Hogwarts between the death eaters and the staff and students, where are the memories of Tom Riddle’s past and the explanation about Dumbledore trying to destroy the horcrux in the ring? How in the world are you gonna know whats going on if David Yates and the screenwriters, proceed as if it is assumed that you’re familiar with the story or if not then it doesn’t matter? For other fans who read the books and are disappointed I am in total agreement…for the others who did not read the books I am sorry you have no idea what you are missing in this movie.

  21. pallavi
    July 27th, 2009 at 4:53 am

    movie not good not a full story

  22. Furqan
    July 31st, 2009 at 8:23 am

    Jst saw the movie.. Not exactly wht I was hoping for!!!

  23. JJ
    July 31st, 2009 at 2:08 pm

    I almost fell asleep during the movie! That’s how boring it was! It was nothing like the book…. What a disappointment! Remake please!

  24. Jhovaleene
    August 8th, 2009 at 7:41 am

    In this movie…
    Actully i can not understand what is happining to this movie!!!
    I was expected that this movie was so good!!
    But I was very dissappointed when i whatched it!! DAMMN!!!

    This is the worst movie i watched so far! they just wasted the good plot of HBP. plzZ REMAKE it!!!

  25. Sammy
    October 6th, 2009 at 4:58 pm

    OMG. I want to see the movie really bad but I heard its not as good as the book!! Is this true?!

  26. bong
    November 16th, 2009 at 12:33 pm

    If and only if they have included the hogwarts battle and cut down some of the frivolous scenes it might have saved the movie and satisfied everyone even those who did not read the book.
    This was what was lacking to complete the movie.
    It sounds exactly like that, an incomplete movie.

    I was waiting for some action and my suspicions were confirmed when i read the book after the movie

    I only read the book AFTER the movie and was my first time to read any Harry Potter book.
    Still i felt that this movie was the most dragging of all the HP movies
    (inspite of the comedy) and lacked the proper send-off for Dumbledore’s demise.
    There was no setup for his death, no sense of dread, no build up of suspense for the character’s premise which should have made this movie controversial but in the end, just made this beloved character’s exit almost unmemorable.

    After reading the book i realized if they included the Hogwarts battle and kept the rest of the movie the same those two hours i spent watching wouldnt make me feel i was missing something important somehow in the story telling coz
    SInce that was hogwarts and they were attacked by the death-eaters there shoud’ve been an all out battle.
    tsk tsk they could have had something like the Lord of the Rings battle what with the dark and dreary atmosphere pervading the movie yety im pretty dissapointed even if i havent read the book that time.
    Its lacking fire.

  27. JC
    March 7th, 2010 at 12:44 am

    wow people ur just stupid,this is just an adaptation of the book!!!
    so it sucks cause they cut parts wow they do all what is possible to make em the best as possible!try to make a movie urself o wait u cant haha,wow and u some of u wont watch the last installments cause of this,u really need to get a life,the hatred over great HP6 movie is cause is the last one same was with order of the phoenix then stupid people forget it and say hbp is the worst when they dont care like if they never hated good ootp same will be with dh part 1 u will say is the worst one!and forget u hated hp cause it wont be the last one anymore ur RIDIKKULUS!!!

  28. Steph
    March 22nd, 2010 at 10:33 am

    Having just rewatched HBP after reading the book very recently, I was shocked by the amount of critical plot points in the book that were left out of the movie. I know that movies adapted from books generally never live up to the original, but so far I’ve been pleased with the HP series for doing just that – remaining true to the source and presenting the world of HP in a way that most readers found satisfying and enhancing. Not so with HBP, which fell horribly flat after Order of the Pheonix, which I feel was one of the best HP movies so far. So much was left out I cringe wondering how the heck they plan on making Deathly Hallows make any sense, as HBP is basically a back story/set up for DH.

    I have heard DH is going to be divided into a 2 part film. I think perhaps they will include a lot of what was left out in HBP in the first film of DH, perhaps thinking that in the movie world its better to have it all together, i dont know. I wish they would remake HBP altogether but will hold reservations until i see DH.

    To the OP – as an outside viewer (not a reader or a fan) your assessment of HBP seems spot on. If you hadn’t read the book you would have no idea what is missing and probably find it a mildly entertaining and certainly beautiful film!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>